PeopleCode


Lately, I’ve been using the MsgGetText() built-in function to concatenate adhoc strings in PeopleCode. For example, instead of the following:


Local string &TEXTLINE = "Value of " | &fld1name | " is " | &fld1value | ".";

Using MsgGetText, it can be re-written as follows:


Local string &TEXTLINE = MsgGetText(0, 0, "Value of %1 is %2.", &fld1name, &fld1value);

I find that the latter is easier to read and modify compared to the first, especially if there are a lot of values being concatenated.

What about performance? Wouldn’t the MsgGetText code needlessly query the database for message (0, 0)? Fortunately, I think not. Some tests with SQL trace turned on — and the cache freshly cleared — show that a query to the message catalog for message (0, 0) is never performed by the application server. A wonderful optimization.

The following are a couple of I believe not well-known coding standards for PeopleCode that I strictly adhere to. These are something I don’t see most people or teams are adapting, but something I really recommend looking into for the benefits that they offer.
read more…

I’ve come across the following statement on PeopleBooks (PeopleCode API Reference > Application Classes > When Would You Use Application Classes?). This statement can be found in PeopleBooks for PeopleTools versions 8.45 to 8.49:

… suppose you want to provide a more generic sort, with comparison function at the end of it. You want to use the array class Sort method, but your process has to be generic: you aren’t certain if you’re comparing two records or two strings. You could define a class that had as its main method a comparison, and return a -1, 0, or 1. Then write your personalized sort, extending the array class method Sort.

I find this statement very vague and lacking in details, that I am doubtful about its accuracy.

The statement seems to somewhat describe how one would define the ordering of objects in Java’s array and collection classes by creating an implementation of java.util.Comparator interface. However, according to PeopleBooks, the Sort method of the Array class does not have any optional parameters where such a comparator object may be provided.

I couldn’t find anything else in PeopleBooks where it describes the implementation of array sorting in the manner described in the statement above. Can anyone shed some light into this, and if possible, provide additional details? Does the PeopleCode Array class Sort method have an undocumented feature similar Java Arrays’ sort method?

In PeopleSoft application classes, instance variables are analogous to private variables in most object-oriented languages. This means that instance variables are inaccessible from PeopleCode outside the class where it is declared. I used to assume that a specific object (instance of a class) would only have access to its own instance variables. This appears not to be the case, as the following paragraphs in PeopleBooks (PeopleCode API Reference > Application Class > Self-Reference) states:

If you declare an instance variable as private you can still access it as a private property in another instance of the same class. For example, given the following declaration:

class Example
  private
     instance number &Num;
end-class;

A method of Example could reference another Example instance’s &Num instance variable as follows:

   &X = &SomeOtherExample.Num;

read more…

In PeopleCode, when inserting or deleting a row on a scroll, it is required that you perform the action on a parent row of the rowset being inserted/deleted to. PeopleTools doesn’t allow PeopleCode (using the built-in functions/methods InsertRow and DeleteRow) to insert or delete a row on the same scroll within which it is currently running. If you attempt to do this, PeopleTools will give an error complaining about changing the current program context.

However, there are some cases where inserting within the same scroll might be desirable. For example, based on the data entered on a row of a scroll, a new matching row must be inserted within the same scroll.

Yes, you can always make concessions, like forcing the user to click a button on a higher scroll level. Yet if you are looking for a way to insert within the same scroll level, read on. This tutorial illustrates a technique for doing a row insert from PeopleCode to the same scroll where the PeopleCode program is running.
read more…

PeopleTools 8.4x added an option in the PeopleCode function SendMail() for specifying the content-type. In PeopleBooks, what is immediately highlighted is the ability to format your emails using HTML by setting the content-type to text/html. What probably isn’t well known is that it is also possible to set the content-type to other MIME types such as multipart/related.

text/html alone will allow you to format the text of your message. But if you need to display an image such as a logo, <img> tags inside your html will need to link to images stored in a web server somewhere. Sometimes, this is not ideal. With multipart/related, you can embed images in your email messages.

read more…

The PeopleCode SendMail() function is a quick and easy way to send emails from your PeopleSoft application. Unlike workflow routing and Notification classes, SendMail() provides the most functionality when it comes to sending emails. Over the newer releases, PeopleSoft has further added new capabilities to this function like overriding the content-type and sender details. However, the feature that I find the least used is the inclusion of file attachments. This is because in PIA, PeopleCode runs either on the Application server or the Batch server. The files that can be attached should be either 1) located on the server, or 2) accessed by the server through a network share. For this reason, most applications that use file attachments are Application Engine programs (running on the Batch server) that attach log files from within the server.

If you’ve used web-based email services like Yahoo, then you’ll find it a common feature to allow attachments to be uploaded by a user from his workstation and send those attachments with the email message. Is this possible in PeopleSoft’s internet architecture? The answer is yes, this article will show you how.

read more…

Next Page »